Maydestone Deep Energy Retrofit Report
The report describes the energy conservation features installed, and compares their simulated performance to their actual performance. This technical report informs developers, preservation professionals, engineering consultants and the general public of the feasibility and success of an energy retrofit on a historic rehabilitation.
2013 CALGreen Update and Window Replacement
Certain sections do not go into effect until July 1, 2014. A bulletin describing those sections may be found here.2013 Residential Compliance Manual provides a summary of the current code, including guidance on historic residences, which still retains qualified exemptions. The Introduction to the Manual can be downloaded here.
In addition, Section 3, Building Envelope Requirements of the 2013 Residential Compliance Manual, paragraph 3.5.3.B of 'Mandatory Measures, Feature and Devices', states that:
"Site-built Products. There are no specific air leakage requirements for site-built fenestration products but the Standards require limiting air leakage through weatherstripping and caulking."
It appears that no requirement to replace existing windows exists at this time, and that qualified historic residences are taken into consideration. Design professionals are encouraged to review this information provided in the context of all Code requirements for their specific project.
GUIDELINES FOR LEED ND AS A TOOL FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION
The Guidelines provide compelling reasons to retain and reuse historic buildings, which are typically already strategically located in well-developed locations with existing infrastructure in place. The Guidelines further provide instructions to incorporate the rehabilitation of historic buildings into their LEED for Neighborhood Development product, and givers three case studies of projects that have accomplished LEED ND Certification.
Download the PDF file here.
NEW NATIONAL TRUST WINDOW RETROFIT REPORT NOW AVAILABLE
A report just produced by the National Trust for Historic Preservation Green Lab provides cost guidance for homeowners weighing the financial and energy tradeoffs between replacing or repairing older, less efficient windows. This report, "Saving Windows, Saving Money: Evaluating the Energy Performance of Window Retrofit and Replacement", builds on previous research by examining multiple window improvement options, comparing them to replacement windows across multiple climate regions.
Saving Windows, Saving Money’s key findings offer homeowners, contractors, architects and others with compelling evidence of the merits of retrofitting windows as opposed to outright replacement.
Key findings include:
► Retrofit measures can achieve performance results comparable to new replacement windows. This study shows that there are readily available retrofit measures that can achieve energy savings close to new, high performance replacement windows when the performance for each upgrade option is taken into account.
► Almost every retrofit option Offers a better Return on Investment (ROI) than replacement windows. Findings from the cost analysis showed that new, high performance windows are by far the most expensive measure, costing at least double that of common retrofit options when considering materials, installation and general construction commonly required for an existing home. In all climate zones analyzed, cellular shades, interior storm panels and various exterior storm window configurations offer a higher average return on investment compared to new, efficient replacement windows.
►The Bottom Line. Retrofitting windows with high performance enhancements can result in substantial energy savings across a variety of climate zones. Selecting options that retain and retrofit existing windows are the most cost effective way to achieve these energy savings and to lower a home’s carbon footprint. Retrofits extend the life of existing windows, avoid production of new materials, reduce waste and preserve a home’s character.
GREEN GRANTS ANNOUNCED
OHP is pleased to announce the awarding of two “Historic Communities are Green Communities” grants for the 2013 fiscal year.
The San Francisco Planning Department was awarded a $22,453 grant with a proposal to integrate historic preservation into the effort to create EcoDistricts into the neighborhoods South of Market Street (SOMA). Innovative ways to repurpose historic industrial manufacturing structures into new green energy manufacturing will be incorporated. The project will focus on ways in which historic resources can contribute to district scale systems, including how retrofitting could help these resources contribute to and draw from an EcoDistrict.
A final report will be made available at the conclusion of the Grant funding period showing implementation plans that will augment the EcoDistrict and Central Corridor land use plans. Recommendations for policies and programs that support retention of historic buildings as components of district scale systems, including policy impacts on economic viability, standards for process and review, code amendments, and interagency coordination will additionally be discussed.
North Park Main Street (San Diego) was awarded $22,500 for its proposal to continue the work they started with the award of the first “Historic Communities are Green Communities” grant, which outlined specific methods Owners and Tenants of historic North Park properties could retrofit their building envelopes using the Secretary of the Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation to become more energy efficient, as well as ways to conserve water, energy and materials. The focus of this grant will create a Virtual Sustainability Center, which:
• brings the goals of preservation and sustainability directly to the public
• provides a connection between preservation and sustainable practices
• provides a database of historic structures in the district, highlighting improvements and sustainable alterations made to them.
• includes specific notes about the preservation of the resources. The SOIS will be directly referenced.
• includes case studies of successful integration of sustainable strategies while keeping the historic nature.
In addition, the progress of these measures is tracked by calculating and collecting sustainable results, so that:
• carbon and water footprint baselines can be established;
• greenhouse gasses can be inventoried;
• climate data can be registered;
• historical data for use in promoting best sustainable practices can be assessed.
The results will be documented with a short digital movie, which will highlight green activities of Owners, tenants and community organizers, document case studies with interviews of business and historic building owners, and promote business community participation in the NPMS program.
To download the whole report, see the "Sustainable North Park Main Street Report" link below.
Congratulations Grant award recipients!
SUSTAINABLE NORTH PARK MAIN STREET REPORT AVAILABLE ONLINE
In 2009, Wayne Donaldson, California’s State Historic Preservation Officer, challenged North Park Main Street to become the state’s first Sustainable Main Street program. Community leaders embraced this challenge and later that year convened a group of local stakeholders to develop the framework of a sustainability plan in North Park. Working in partnership with OHP, volunteer professionals at Platt/Whitelaw Architects, OBR Architecture, and Zagrodnik+Thomas Architects, NPMS has completed its Sustainable North Park Main Street Study. This Study models energy conservation retrofits using prototypical North Park commercial buildings and expected energy savings, and provides concrete examples of conservation practice for energy, water, open space and tenant operations.
Just Released! Environmental Quantification of Historic Buildings Report from National Trust
The Greenest Building: Quantifying the Environmental Value of Building Reuse, the eagerly anticipated report from the Preservation Green Lab of the National Trust for Historic Preservation is now available. This report which provides the most comprehensive analysis to date of the potential environmental benefit of building reuse, concludes that, when comparing buildings of equivalent size and function, building reuse almost always offers environmental savings over demolition and new construction.
The report’s key findings offer policy-makers, building owners, developers, architects and engineers compelling evidence of the merits of reusing existing buildings as opposed to tearing them down and building new.
- Reuse Matters: Building reuse typically offers greater environmental savings than demolition and new construction. It can take between 10 to 80 years for a new energy efficient building to overcome, through efficient operations, the climate change impacts created by its construction. The study finds that the majority of building types in different climates will take between 20-30 years to compensate for the initial carbon impacts from construction.
- Scale Matters: Collectively, building reuse and retrofits substantially reduce climate change impacts. Retrofitting, rather than demolishing and replacing, just 1% of the city of Portland’s office buildings and single family homes over the next ten years would help to meet 15% of their county’s total CO2 reduction targets over the next decade.
- Design Matters: The environmental benefits of reuse are maximized by minimizing the input of new construction materials. Renovation projects that require many new materials can reduce or even negate the benefits of reuse.
The accepted definition of sustainability from the U.N. World Commission on Environment and Development's 1987 report, "Our Common Future" is that sustainability involves "meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." The intersection of sustainable design and historic preservation would seem a natural alliance.
Older and historic buildings comprise more than half of the existing buildings in the United States. Retention and adaptive reuse of these buildings preserves the materials, embodied energy, and human capital already expended in their construction. The recycling of buildings is one of the most beneficial "green" practices, and stresses the importance and value of historic preservation in the overall promotion of sustainability.
OHP promotes energy and resource conservation in historic buildings and believes this can be accomplished responsibly without compromising the qualities that define their intrinsic historic character. This web page intends to further the discussion and provide examples of sustainability in preservation.
Repair or replacement of original windows is always one of the hottest topics in preservation. There are reasons to replace windows that are too deteriorated to be technically feasible to repair, but energy conservation is not a reason in and of itself to replace an original window. Our new web page WINDOW REPAIR & RETROFIT: Studies + Research features several well-documented studies that demonstrate repair as a viable and preferable sustainable choice. These studies are guaranteed suitable for printing out and waving in the air at your next historic preservation meeting.
CEQA & GENERAL PLANS
Cities are beginning to include CEQA requirements to mitigate greenhouse gas production in their General Plans. Some cities with good examples are showcased on the Legislation, Policies, Ordinances page.
Major Renovation Design Incentives: Savings By Design is offering incentives to designers of nonresidential new construction or major renovation projects that are located within the service territory of a participating utility and will reduce Title 24 energy consumption requirements by at least 15% on a whole building performance basis. Check here for all the requirements of the program.
SOLAR RIGHTS ACT: A SUGGESTED BASIS FOR REVIEW
There has been concern among historic preservation commissions as to how or whether to approach the review of design of solar installations in historic districts or on historic resources. Parts of the language contained within the Solar Rights Act suggest that no "aesthetic" reviews are permitted. However, the Solar Rights Act, interpreted as a whole, suggests alternative courses of action. Visit our Solar Rights Act web page to learn more.
New Fees for NPS Tax Credit Review Published
New fees for NPS review of Historic Preservation Certification Applications
will go into effect on December 31, 2012. The Federal Register notice
announcing the new fees appears at:
New fees apply to new project applications received by SHPOs on or
after December 31, 2012. Part 2 applications received by SHPOs before
December 31 will continue to be billed under the fee schedule in effect
since 1984. Part 3 applications describing completed work in previously
reviewed Part 2 applications will also be billed under the “old” fee
TPS will post the new fee schedule on the Tax Incentives Program website,
along with FAQs.
SEND OHP EXAMPLES
OHP is seeking examples of California green preservation rehabilitations, both LEED certified and non-LEED certified, sustainable local ordinances that incorporated historic building considerations, and stories of green and preservation experiences. Questions and/or examples can be forwarded to Mark Huck, AIA, LEED AP.
OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION
1725 23rd Street, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95816
Mark C. Huck, AIA, LEED AP
(916) 445-7011 Office
OHP SUSTAINABLE PRESERVATION BROCHURE
Download the Sustainable Preservation brochure:
OHP Sustainable Preservation Brochure
Guidelines on Sustainability for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings
PRESERVATION BRIEF 3 REVISED
The National Park Service has revised Preservation Brief 3:ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN HISTORIC BUILDINGS to reflect current developments and best practices in sustainability.
AIA & USGBC Self Report - No Current Event
Questions? Contact Mark Huck